What was the actual result of jackson’s policy of “rotation in office”?
an end to corruption in washington
a replacement of adams’s political loyalists with jackson’s political loyalists
the filling of government posts with officials the people chose themselves
the creation of the kitchen cabinet

A replacement of Adams's political loyalists with Jackson's political loyalists

Explanation:

President Andrew Jackson invoked the rotation in federal office as a principle, he defended that “no one man has any more intrinsic right to office than another”. But the actual result of this policy was that he cleansed the federal civil service from John Quincy Adam’s appointees and replaced them for his own.

This rotation occurred in many places, including civil servants in the states and communities and land offices.

one of the main reasons was definitely slavery. back in 1861, republican abraham lincoln was elected and ended up being a major influence in the slavery business. slavery greatly affected the texas economy because back in 1845 during the annexation of texas, slaves became a big part of the texas population. many texans that were in favor of the secession influenced groups through party ties.

as general terms,  indian territory,  the indian territories, or  indian country  describe an evolving land area set aside by the  united states government  for the relocation of  native americans  who held  aboriginal title  to their land. in general, the tribes ceded land they occupied in exchange for  land grants  in 1803. the concept of an indian territory was an outcome of the 18th- and 19th-century policy of  indian removal. after the  civil war(1861–1865), the policy of the government was one of  assimilation.