One way to show that you’ve really thought about an issue is to state an opposing point of view and then explain why yours is still the best one. strengthen your argument by explaining why you disagree with a specific claim from the opposite point of view.
finally, restate your position on dropping the bomb and tell president truman what you want him to do. close by signing your letter.
then click the “done” button to review your work.

the doctrine of nullification recommended that states living inside the union have the one-sided, inalienable ideal to void any law made by the national government that could be esteemed illegal.

the united states was shaped based on a general agreement among its individual states. hence, it is inferred that under the hypothesis of invalidation, since the states are the establishment of the union, they have the ability to referee and disprove unlawful laws.

no options provided, here,but the answer to this question is often: a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy.

clearly from the answer, the historian alludes to historical sources,and records to aid in analyzing and drawing conclusion on the effect of the war on the economy of japan.

(b) britain had a much larger navy than the u.s.

(d) the u.s. had a small army compared to britain.

this is a good question! i'll do some research and come back when i have the answer!