How has supreme court precedent changed your fifth amendment rights over time? check all that apply. officers can pressure a person to confess to a crime. officers must communicate a person’s rights to before questioning the person in custody. officers can question someone immediately if public safety is at risk. officers can communicate a person’s rights in their own words if they communicate the same meaning. officers may create different sets of rules to apply to groups of citizens however they .

Explanation:

In United States, whenever any questions regarding the issue rises, the confession that is incompetent because not voluntary is solved by the part of the “Fifth Amendment to Constitution of United States”, stating that no person can be compelled to be the witness against himself in any criminal case.

It applies to Officers who must communicate a person’s rights before questioning the person in their custody.If there is risk for public safety, the officers can immediately question anyone. Any person’s rights can be communicated by Officers in their own words if they communicate those in the same meaning.

what are the options mate?

explanation:

not to be rude or anything but, nobody can really answer that if you don't add the options sorry if it came of rude uwu

the answer is d. selective incorporation. (apex)