According to the ruling in new york times united states, which best describes what the government had to prove for its
censorship of the new york times to have been acceptable?
the articles would have had to indisputably threaten national security.
the articles would have had to be harshly critical of the military.
the articles would have had to reveal classified information
the articles would have had to support the enemy in wartime.

i would go with the last one

the punishment for breaking the law would depend on the conditions or the seriousness of the law being broken, if he or she breaks the law while doing some great discovery or invention then it would classify as a scientific fraud. there are other words to describe the crime but scientific fraud would be the harshest one.

australian plates collided into eurasian plates, and the himalayas formed. the andes mountain range the himalayas and the islands of japan form differently. the andes mountain range formed at the convergent boundary of an oceanic plate and continental plate.

the option which was not a function of missionaries in the northwest was the first one - they established posts for trading furs and other goods.

missionaries were sent around the world to spread religion and their knowledge and others - they were not merchants who sold furs and other goods.