"the sun never shined on a cause of greater worth 'tis not the affair of a city, a country, a province, or a kingdom, but of a continent -- of
at least one eighth part of the habitable globe. 'tis not the concern of a day, a year, or an age posterity (children, descendants) are
virtually involved in the contest and will be more or less affected, even to the end of time, by the proceedings now. now is the seed time
of continental (colonies') union, faith and honor. the least fracture now will be like a name enraved with the point of a pin on the tender
rind of a young oak, the wound will enlarge with the tree, and posterity read it in full grown characters."
this paragraph begins with one of the most famous hyperboles in american writing (remember that a hyperbole is an overstatement or
exaggeration to emphasize a point.) how does paine lead you to view the cause of american independence with the use of hyperbole?
a the hyperboles are poetic - their use makes his prose come to life
ob the hyperboles are suggestions - either follow his suggestions or don't
the hyperboles are ultimates - the most worthy of worthy causes, affecting the future now and forever.
d. the hyperboles are imperatives - listen or be sorry

a, both were musicians during the jazz age

in the united states, the president is controlled by the

constitution, and in all respects subordinate to it. insofar

as it deals with presidential power, however, the american

constitution has proved to be a highly malleable document.

with very few exceptions,' the constitutional provisions relating to the president have not been changed at all since

they were ratified in 1787. but in the late twentieth century, those provisions do not mean what they meant in

1787. the constitution is a legal document, and it is enforced judicially; but its meaning was hardly fixed when it

was ratified. in particular, the contemporary president has

far broader powers than the original constitution contemplated. it is remarkable but true that large-scale changes in

the authority of the president have been brought about

without changes in the constitutional text, but nevertheless

without significant illegality.

this is a paradox. is it not clear that constitutional

changes, if not textual, are illegal? the paradox has considerable relevance to our current thinking about the presidency in particular and about constitutionalism in general.

perhaps the framers of the american constitution feared

legislative power most of all; 2 but from well-known events

in the twentieth century, it is possible to conclude that it is

presidential power that holds out the greatest risks to both

liberty and democracy. the president is by far the most visible leader in the nation; he is often the only person in government with a national constituency. moreover, he is

you are really obsesed w/ the wolverines

explanation:

its not a bad thing to be honest