2
ii
what is one advantage a primary source has over a secondary source?
ne
o
a. a primary source offers a firsthand account of an event.
o
b. a primary source always includes several perspectives.
o
c. a primary source generally benefits from having been written after
an event.
des
o
d. a primary source combines several different accounts of an event.
nebu

he believed that congress would be better not dealing with "lobbyists", or people who seek to influence (a politician or public official) on an issue, since historically, they had problems with these kinds of people. he thought lobbying produces benefits, but should be carefully monitored.

the answer to this question is the third option. hope this

the catholic church withhold people's access to the bible during the middle ages.

people could go to church and listen to the teachings, but it was absolutely forbidden to own and/or read the books of both the old and new testaments. it was also prohibited to translate the books (which where originally in biblical hebrew) to any other language.

this was done so the church could remain in control of what their teachings were and to enhance their importance and power, while also being able to judge people's actions through information that was unavailable for the general public.

cruel, heartless

explanation: