What did dred scott argue in the scott v. sandford case?

Dred Scott argued in the Scott v. Sanford case that, after traveling and staying with his master in a free state, he had been emancipated by that state's laws.

Explanation: Dred Scott increasingly exposed that many of the calls for popular sovereignty in establishing new territories as free or slave states relied heavily on the nullification by the courts of the laws of free states. Abraham Lincoln's campaign in 1860 relied heavily on noting how recent actions like the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott, and the Fugitive Slave Act had refused to respect the North's laws concerning slavery and helped him win the election without southern support.

depends on the age of the teen, many believe by the age of 16 a person should know the strong difference between right and wrong along with the difference between risky and immediate death. swimming with sharks might be dangerous but swimming with sharks while bloody meat is attached to you is just insane. even more if you have no idea what you're doing. however, no matter the age, as long as the person is skilled enough and has the mental and physical capacity to control their actions doing whatever sport they put their mind to is all that matters.

which

like dude you only explained

the problem not the