Is it legitimate for people who are being taxed without direct representation to start a revolution?

Yes

Explanation:

I mean, The United States did it, and I’m assuming that is what the question is referring too.

America was thousands of miles from Britain, and had no power over what happened to them. They held no representatives in parliament, so they had no control over what happened to them. I think it is completely sensible for the colonies to be upset over that, enough so to throw a revolution.

the california missions began in the late 18th century as an effort to convert native americans to catholicism and expand european territory. there were 21 missions in all, lasting from 1769 until about 1833.   the missions were built by the spanish starting in 1769 in order to “colonize” the territory of alta california. so the missions were important because they were the means of settling california. it also wanted to keep other european countries out of alta california. building settlements along the coast would them meet these goals. missionaries wanted to convert the indians to the roman catholic faith. california indians did much of the work to build missions.

brainliest is someone you pick by simply clicking a button. it only shows up if there are two people that answered your question, then you decide who answer more accurately with detail and explanation and you give that person the title "brainliest".

i hope this your understandings.