2points
when making a historical interpretation about an event, a historian requires:
o
a. an understanding of other historians' views on the event.
o
b. a strong thesis related to the event's significance.
o
c. access to sources that are relevant to the event.
o
d. inferences about the primary causes of the event,

I believe the answer to be B, although I may be wrong.

Explanation:

A thesis statement is always important, including in a historical interpretation.

genetics is the study of how dna works, the methodologies defining the new recent technologies allow scientist to have a panoramic view of the entire dna landscape, especially how genomes interact with their environment, including off course, factors outside their organisms.

thus is very possible the existence of both scenarios, where populations of isolated individuals have different genetic traits, and share traits related to genetic mutation, due rats can easily travel overseas using human transport channels. so scientists could get a vast number of data, including human interaction, evolution of rodents, health development, spread of infections, development of new organisms, how genomes evolve in different environments and so on.

well first we can compare on what the slave masters ate and what the slaves ate well the masters ate fancy great food like chicken rice mash potatose and stuff like that and slaves ate well food that your not suppost to eat like the weird parts of turkey and chicken and slaves master chilled beat and eat and slaves work get beat and get little of sleep there you go