Would the league of nations have been more effective in preventing wars if the united states supported the league of nations? explain your reasoning.
follow these guidelines for your discussion posts:
-at least 150-300 words in length.
-grammatically and mechanically correct.
-address all parts of the prompt.
-provide at least one example to support your response. (example choices include an anecdote, statistic, and/or textual evidence.)

we will reach the goal of freedom in birmingham and all over the nation,

the main reason the us senate rejected the treaty of versailles was because "european nations wanted to punish germany"

d(:

me and mark as brainliest.

        i'm fairly sure that the correct answers are 2 and 3.

        i used both my knowledge of world history and the process of elimination to obtain these answers. option 1 cannot be a possible selection because the mandate of heaven belongs to ancient chinese philosophical belief. option 4 sounds like it would benefit the region than detriment it. however, both 2 and 3 explain a potential reason for what could have contributed to the fall of the roman empire.

      hope this ! if i were you, i'd get a second opinion, because i haven't taken this course for a year. best of luck!

***websites that me understand the curriculum better last year are and ***

the answer is d. selective incorporation. (apex)