Explain how one branch of government can “overrule” another branch of government beyond the traditional separation of powers and checks and balances ?

m!

For example, from the point of view of lawmakers, one of Nixon’s main abuses was the “retention war,” the multi-billion presidential sequestration of budget items approved by Congress.

Explanation:

Although in the USA the principle of separation of powers has been implemented in practice for more than two hundred years, changing and adapting throughout this long period of time, it has not been possible to develop an ideal model of separation of powers. From time to time, conflicts arise between the authorities on the basis of excess of entrusted powers or accusations of unconstitutionality of actions. First of all, the criticism is addressed to the heads of state who ignored the opinion of Congress and violated the provisions of federal laws, without consulting or requesting permission for certain actions from the highest legislative body.

A distinctive feature of the evolution of the presidency in recent times has been the expansion of not only the executive branch assigned to it by the Constitution, but also legislative powers. According to the constitution, the legislative powers of the president are reduced to the right of a legislative veto arising from the principle of checks and balances. In recent times, the head of the executive branch has used this right more actively than in the era of the traditional presidency.

Since Roosevelt’s time, the president’s legislative initiatives have become institutionalized in the form of detailed bills that are regularly sent to Congress. Roosevelt's board contributed to the creation of a tradition called the legislative presidency, and once and for all changed the ratio of legislative initiatives of the head of the executive branch and Congress.

For example, from the point of view of lawmakers, one of Nixon’s main abuses was the “retention war,” the multi-billion presidential sequestration of budget items approved by Congress.

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

One branch of government can “overrule” another branch of government beyond the traditional separation of powers and checks and balances in the following way.

The nature of the checks and balance system is that none of the three branches can be above the other. But when one of the branches commits some faults that compromise the honesty of the government of the US or represents a risk for the country, the other two can act under the laws and powers granted by the United States Constitution.

For instance, the executive branch and the legislative branch. Let's put the case of the impeachment of the US President as happened with Richard Nixon (he resigned before being impeached) or the actual impeachment process to the President.

In both cases, the United States Congress investigated the conduct and actions of the President and concluded that there was enough evidence of wrongdoings committed by the President and that there were reasons to start an impeachment procedure against the President.

i believe it would be capitalism

listed the works which were

banned by the church=index librorum prohibitorum

questioned many tenets

of the catholic church=

martin luther’s

ninety-five

theses

an authoritative treatise

on witchcraft=mallets maleficarum

a set of meditation, prayer, and

contemplation exercises to

strengthen one’s relationship

with god=spiritual exercises

hope it ✔