4. describe a case in which the supreme court used the principle of equal protection - possibly through
the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment - to expand civil rights for marginalized
groups. then describe how the supreme court used the equal protection clause to limit a program that
benefited marginalized groups in regents of the university of california v. bakke. (4 points)
for the first example, choose from these cases:
• hernandez v. texas
• bolling v. sharpe
• boynton v. virginia
• united states v. virginia
• obergefell v. hodges

- three-quarters or two-thirds..

- "the constitution provides that an amendment may be proposed either by the congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the house of representatives and the senate or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures."

< 3

no

explanation:

not everyone in america is free. it is has always been a unequal society. and yet people come in swarms, in search of better lives. some are brought as children, unaware, unknowing. some arrive and just don’t leave. they build lives, pay taxes, raise families. some enter illegally, fleeing persecution in their home country.

there are many reasons why human beings are so attracted to america, despite its history of bitterness towards immigrants.

there are almost two million immigrants brought to the us when they were children. president donald trump and his collaborators are determined to rid the us of as many undocumented immigrants as they can, and stop others from coming because none of their ancestors were immigrants.

america has so many things and yet it lacks the one thing that humanity needs to fully thrive. and so this country will not be at peace in itself until it resolves the pain at the heart of slavery, attacking immigrants, and crumble the rights of those with less power.

i know number 8 is something about only using 3/5 of the slave votes.