How did the results of the tehran conference compare with the goals of allied leaders?
allied leaders compromised in order to open a second front in the mediterranean.
allied leaders compromised by turning their attention to japan and the pacific.
allied leaders compromised and agreed to open a second front in france.
allied leaders refused to compromise, and each nation continued with its own strategy.

The correct answer is C) Allied leaders compromised and agreed to open a second front in France.

The results of the Tehran conference compared with the goals of Allied leaders were that "Allied leaders compromised and agreed to open a second front in France."

The three Allied leaders in World War II met in Tehran, to define the strategy to follow in that stage of the War. Soviet Union Joseph Stalin, Great Britain Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and US President Franklin D. Roosevelt got together on November 28, until December 1, 1943, and agreed to open up a new war front in France to fight the Gerrman Army. They planned the invasion of France for June 6, 1944.

for starters, there is the structural trend of rising primary government expenditure as a share of gdp, which reached 36% in 2014, up from 22% in 1991. this increase reflected a political desire to address the poverty and inequality that had gone unaddressed during previous decades. to support the increase, brazil’s government increased taxes on consumption and promoted progress toward labor-market formalization. nonetheless, public investment, particularly in infrastructure, took a hit. in fact, with the exception of the 2005-2008 period, total investment as a share of gdp has remained below 20% since 1991.

b or c im pretty sure