After the constitution was written in 1787, what did the federalists and the anti-federalists want? a. the federalists wanted the constitution amended to describe the national government as a federal system; the anti-federalist wanted the constitution to establish a parliamentary system of government. b. the federalists wanted to add a clause to the constitution that outlawed slavery; the anti-federalists wanted a guarantee that slavery would not be abolished for 20 years. c. the federalists wanted the constitution to be ratified as written; the anti-federalists wanted the constitution to include a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms and limit the power of the national government. d. the federalists wanted to abolish state governments and give their power to the federal government; the anti-federalists wanted each state government to be more powerful than the federal government.

C. The federalists wanted the constitution to be ratified as written; the Anti-Federalists wanted the constitution to include a Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms and limit the power of the national government, is the correct answer.

Explanation:

The ones who favoured the ratification of the new constitution drafted at the constitutional convention were known as  Federalists, while those who opposed it were known as Anti Federalists. The federalists wanted the constitution to be ratified as written because they believed that the new Constitution was perfect and in place o Bill of Rights  congress could propose amendments in future, but the anti federalists wanted the Bill of Rights to be added in the constitution so as to prevent the federal government from encroaching upon the state powers. They were afraid that the central government would become too powerful without the Bill of Rights.

can you post options so i can ?

isolationism is a doctrine practiced by the united states for much of its history with the aim of not intervening in external affairs that did not pose a real threat to their country. the united states managed to maintain a state of political isolation throughout the nineteenth century and the first part of the xx. few nations have been able to maintain such a position for such a long period of time. historians argue that it is largely due to geographical reasons, given the physical distance between europe and the usa. uu the venataja of this situation is that the national state can spend its resources in satisfying all the needs of its inhabitants, without the need to invest in armament and equipment for a war that does not directly affect the country.

internationalism is a political and cultural movement that advocates for greater political and economic cooperation among nations for mutual benefit. this novimiento was transformed over time, today it includes military intervention in international conflicts with the objective of maintaining peace. the advantage of this move is in the international contacts and the influence developed by the country that carries it forward.

between the two modes of relations between states, i prefer the first, since i believe it is of the utmost importance to satisfy the needs of citizens and work for their development and as a last option to act on the international level.