subject
History, 29.10.2019 18:31 sacoratelfare8839

In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because a. the suspect's blood was drawn in a safe way b. the rights of the individual take precedence over public safety c. the officer did not have time to secure a warrant d. the suspect's privacy rights cannot be violated

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 04:00
Why was there so little resistance in the war from the german people?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:30
How many countries have signed the kyoto protocol?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:50
Which historical interpretation is supported by this source?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 14:50
What was the final battle of the civil war
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
In schmerber v. california, the court said that a search warrant was not necessary because a. the s...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
Chemistry, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
Mathematics, 11.05.2021 01:20
question
English, 11.05.2021 01:20
Questions on the website: 13722359