In eyes of greek ancient philosophers, aristotle in particular, organized society or any political community which greeks labeled as a polis was natural habitat to humans. therefore, aristotle labeled humans as group of answer choices political animal homo sapiens unfit to rule intrinsically bad

Aristole labeled human as a Political animal

Explanation:

To him, humans were designed to live in society, and couldn't prosper without an organized community. Plus, humans desire to stay close to their peers, for safety, common love, cooperation, social development or conversation. However, most important. As a political animal, humans could create a political structure, equal and fair. Aristotle was influenced by his world when he proposed this argument. Ancient Greek was formed by several islands, each one isolated to the other. The populations who lived in those locations had only each other, so it's normal Aristotle thinks about cities and the necessity to stay close to them. Isolation would represent a setback to animal behavior.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.