subject
History, 08.11.2019 00:31 bumeh511

The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that have submitted
cases for the court's review. the justices then select about
75 cases to more fully review and decide. for each case,
the justices debate the facts and then vote on a ruling. the
court rules in favor of whichever side is supported by the
majority of the justices. one justice then writes a majority
opinion, summarizing the court's reasoning. justices who
disagree with the ruling may write their own dissenting
opinions to explain their objections.
which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this
description of the supreme court's decision-making process?
o
a. the supreme court is required to make a decision on every case
that is appealed to it.
o
b. dissenting opinions are written by lawyers representing the losing
party rather than justices.
o
c. two-thirds of the justices have to agree on a ruling rather than a
simple majority.
o
d. the supreme court does not hear public arguments before
deciding which cases to review.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Which of the following was a reason why the loss of alsace and lorraine to germany was a major blow to france?
Answers: 3
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:40
How was apartheid practiced in south africa
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
-what is one question you might ask after reading the fred munguia's story?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 01:10
What is the purpose of biofertilizers? a reduce pollution b. reduce insect threats c. reduce erosion d reduce herbicide use select the best answer from the choices provided 0 0 0 0
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The supreme court begins its new session by hearing
public arguments from all parties that hav...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 18.07.2019 06:00
Questions on the website: 13722361