What is the difference between the terms “not guilty” and “innocent? ”
it cannot be proved that an individual is “innocent.” juries say “not guilty” because guilt was not proved in the case.
the terms have no significant difference in meaning.
juries and judges use them the same way in a court of law. “not guilty” is a verdict used in criminal cases only. however, an “innocent” verdict can only be used in civil cases.
a jury will say “innocent” instead of “not guilty” if the person seems to have had no part in the case before the court.

answer: well, "not guilty" by a jury would mean that they were probably accused, but wrongly, and those who were actually not involved or were bystanders ( innocent, ) in which is not really the exact same thing.

explanation:

answer:

not guilty is used when there is not enough evidence to be proven guilty

explanation:

in 1803 the louisiana purchase took place, doubling the size of the country. by 1840 almost 7 million americans had migrated westward in hopes of securing land and being prosperous. the belief that settlers were destined to expand to the west is often referred to as manifest destiny.

explanation:

where is the picture