3. select two cases in which the supreme court incorporated provisions of the bill of
rights:
• gitlow v. new york (freedom of speech)
• mapp v. ohio (protection against unreasonable search and seizure)
• gideon v. wainwright (right to a lawyer)
• griswold v. connecticut (right to privacy)
• mcdonald v. chicago (right to bear arms)
briefly summarize the two cases and explain why the provisions were incorporated
on a case-by-case basis. (4 points)

Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech)

Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer)

Explanation: Gitlow v. New York (freedom of speech) it was a decision of the United States Supreme Court, stating that the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was stipulated as a First Amendment Revision protecting freedom of expression and freedom of the press to apply in the US states.

Gideon v. Wainwright (right to a lawyer) this is a case of the United States Supreme Court. In it, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that states are required, under the Sixth Amendment to the US Constitution, to provide a lawyer to defendants in criminal cases that cannot afford their own lawyers.

i think it would be reparing roads  

the lowest among the social higher rank were the working class. this class remained detached to the political progression   of the country and was hostile to the other two classes