subject
History, 26.11.2019 07:31 alex7881

"in american history, 20 students failed. only 11 students failed world history. american history must be a more difficult course than world history." this statement is criticized because the measurement "number of students who fail" is being used as an indicator of "course difficulty." thus, "number of students who fail" is claimed to be a) invalid. b) confounded. c) unreliable. d) biased. e) categorical.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
Explain the reasons for u.s. neutrality during the 1920s and 1930s. how did ideas about neutrality change during the period from the end of world war i to the passage of the lend-lease act? be sure to include any events, terms, or people that may support your response.
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:00
What did the mexican solders eat during 1833
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:10
How did the economic impacts of the great depression differ in the united states and in the soviet union?
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:00
Which of the following elements is not typical of an advanced society? a. cities b. science c. industries d. and nomadic lifestyle
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
"in american history, 20 students failed. only 11 students failed world history. american history mu...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 03:20
question
Chemistry, 23.02.2021 03:20
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2021 03:20
Questions on the website: 13722363