Answer !
rembrandt created many versions of his self-portrait, sketching, etching or painting himself more than one hundred times. if you were to create a self-portrait, how would you picture yourself? what setting would you choose? what facial expression? what artistic techniques would you use? what medium would you choose? (paint, pencil, chalk, collage, etc.) would you use props to show special interests? remember, a self-portrait not only lets people see your physical features, it also lets people know about your interests, dreams and personality. use descriptive language so the reader is able to "see" your portrait.

I would picture myself a child. I’d be in a meadow of tall dry grasses and small wildflowers. I’d be wearing a white dress and a white sun hat. I would choose oil paint because it leaves amazing texture. No props but a brilliant blue sky with huge puffy clouds.

Explanation:

citizens united v. federal election commission, case in which the u.s. supreme court on january 21, 2010, ruled (5–4) that laws that prevented corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds for independent “electioneering communications” (political advertising) violated the first amendment’s guarantee of freedom of speech. in so doing the court invalidated section 203 of the federal bipartisan campaign reform act of 2002 (bcra)—also known as the mccain-feingold act for its sponsors, sen. john mccain and sen. russ feingold—as well as section 441(b) of the federal election campaign act of 1971 (feca), which the bcra had amended. the court also overturned in whole or in part two previous supreme court rulings: austin v. michigan chamber of commerce (1990) and mcconnell v. federal election commission (2003).

immediately perceived as historically important, the decision generated intense controversy outside the court. some hailed it as a resounding victory for freedom of speech, while others criticized it as an overreaching attempt to rewrite campaign finance law. among the critics was pres. barack obama, who remarked in his state of the union address in the house of representatives one week later that the decision would “open the floodgates for special interests…to spend without limit in our elections.” his criticism provoked one of the supreme court justices in attendance, samuel a. alito, to break decorum by mouthing the words “not true.”

explanation:

the statment would be a easy nonviolent one