How could a new point of view historians understand

this report?

it could them record new evidence related to the

event.

it could them develop a better understanding of past

ideas.

it could them preserve older evidence in a new way.

it could them disprove all the eyewitness accounts.

o

It could make them understand past ideas better.

Explanation:

Historians are searching for causes and consequences that explain the situation and why. We try to think about the people who existed through the eyes.

Historians ask themselves questions while researching history. Historians make conclusions about the past through the answers to the questions.

A new perspective lets historians appreciate the study by improving their knowledge of historical theories.

A new study with historical subjects leads to findings that serve to equate historians with the new information in the official version of history. Naturally, this can rewrite history as new evidence can answer historical concerns.

For this reason, it is so important for historians to continue to ask questions and to create different viewpoints. For order to achieve this, they must be willing to hear or see various versions of what official history reported or even to oppose them.

explanation:

omgggggg i go to k12 too : d

regarding the law, the 15th amendment was specifically designed thinking in the rights of black free men.

even though ratified on february 3, 1870, the promise of the 15th amendment would not be fully applied for a long time.poll taxes and literacy tests would allow southern states disenfranchise african americans. only in 1965 the voting rights for african americans would be actually able to vote in the south.

in 1965, president johnson signed the voting rights act, which aimed to overcome legal barriers that prevented african americans from voting as it was guaranteed by the 15th amendment to the u.s. constitution.