Which factor does the supreme court generally consider especially important
when deciding which cases to review?
o
a. whether the parties involved in the case are members of minority
groups
) b. whether judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's
original ruling
o
c. whether the law being challenged originated in congress or a
state legislature
o
d. whether the case deals with broad issues that apply to many
different cases

Whether judicial activism appears to have influenced the case's original ruling

Option B

Explanation:

Normally the cases that come to Supreme Court are the ones that had been appealed for justice to review case from lower courts. The Supreme Court does not take any case just like that it takes up the case only if there is any breach in the federal law or any issue that is involving state laws.

Before heard by the Supreme Court it asks for details to be submitted with evidence by the trial court. Cases which involves national attention and needs a trial will be taken by the Supreme Court. If the case was influenced by judicial activism it is appeal-able to the Supreme Court. The Supreme court then resolves this case.

aug 15, 2012 - although van leeuwenhoek was not the inventor of the microscope, he advanced it more he loved to grind and focus a new lens in order to see the unseen world. most of leeuwenhoek's microscopes were silver. in a simple but significant experiment (1668), he demonstrated that worms found on

i think the answer is: cuba wanted to be independent from spain, and the u.s. wanted to end spanish rule in the west.

hope i

-lavira : )