subject
History, 07.12.2019 21:31 yoongislaugh

Why was the
rights act of 1964 so effective in immediately
taking away the de jure component of jim crow?
how was the process of implementing this law
different from the process of implementing the
brown v. board of education decision?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
It can be inferred that the dramatic increase in defense spending by germany was the result of. (a) attempts by great britain to take german colonies. ( b) fear of a two-front war against france and russia (c) the need to put down a communist rebellion (d) a competition with the allies to produce atomic weapons
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 00:00
Which of the following is true about a merger? a. it is an example of deregulation. c. it is a combination of two or more companies into a single firm. b. it violates the sherman anti-trust act of 1890. d. it always leads to economic growth.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:00
The antiwar protests of the late-1960s contributed to which of these? the election of lyndon johnson passage of the voting rights act passage of the 26th amendment the geneva accords
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:10
What problems did socialist thinkers seek to solve
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why was the
rights act of 1964 so effective in immediately
taking away the de jure compo...
Questions
question
Spanish, 11.10.2019 13:50
question
History, 11.10.2019 13:50
Questions on the website: 13722363