subject
History, 17.12.2019 12:31 Areyano8299

In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following judicial precedent
"avoids the instability and unfairness that accompany disruption of settled legal expectations. for this reason, the rule of
law demands that adhering to our prior case law be the norm. departure from precedent is exceptional and requires
special justification."
justice breyer is referring to which of the following legal principles?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 02:00
How did the supreme court change as a result of ronald reagan's presidency? answers?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
Why is the end of the cold war tied to the american domestic economy during this time?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 10:00
Can you describe the american army in 1812?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 11:30
Read the excerpt from โ€œpakistanโ€™s malala.โ€ "ziauddin had a revolutionary zeal and deep commitment to education," ellick said this week. "this charming little girl, she is a mini-version of him in many ways. she loves school, homework. whenever she would meet me she had a bookbag full of books." "she didn't have that idealistic activist attitude when she's 10 and 11, because who does? " ellick said. "her situation demanded that she grow up before she should have. she caught his contagious commitment and idealism." which detail best reflects how living in the taliban-ruled swat valley affected malala?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the case randall v. sorrell (2006), supreme court justice stephen breyer argued that following ju...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 30.08.2019 11:30
question
Health, 30.08.2019 11:30
question
Biology, 30.08.2019 11:30
Questions on the website: 13722361