Me! 20 points!

warren g harding has been ranked among the worst presidents who have served, primarily due to the corruption of his administration. do you think this is a fair assessment? should harding be responsible for the actions of his political appointees? why or why not?

Yes it's fair. The fact is that if they had not been appointed by him the corruption would never have happened, that tells you he really didn't watch his staff or cabinet's action like a real President should so yes I think he should be held responsible.

switch around #3 and #4

explanation:

i hope this , im not 100% on this i really hoped this

during the 20th century, the role of the vice president has evolved into more of an executive branch position. now, the vice president is usually seen as an integral part of a president's administration and presides over the senate only on ceremonial occasions or when a tie-breaking vote may be needed.