Which best describes how industrialization changed the american economy?
industrialization moved the economy away from agriculture
industrialization eliminated the need for imported goods.
industrialization created an export market for american goods.
industrialization created new domestic markets.
o
d();
activity
arch the web and windows

"Industrialization moved the economy away from agriculture", the given statement best describes how industrialization changed the American economy.

Option A

Explanation:

When essentially agriculture is modified to one based on the production of goods than the process is termed as Industrialization. It has been resulted into immense reformation in United States from early 1800’s to the beginning of Civil War.

Industrialization brought transformation in both social and financial circumstances and status of U.S. Business was promoted in large scale due to improved production methods, inventions like barbed wire, typewriter, telephone, electric light, phonograph, steam engine, petrol-engine care etc which paralleled resulted into emergence of slavery.

Profits fetched by entrepreneurs was invested and hiked manpower need which declined the economical status from the section of agriculture as labor with low wages were comfortable to serve in rigid conditions rather than facing loss and pressure in farming due to tax payment and negligible profits.

the vast majority of ballots have been counted nearly two weeks after one of the biggest political upsets in modern u.s. history catapulted donald trump to the presidency.

estimates show more than 58 percent of eligible voters went to the polls during the 2016 election, nearly breaking even with the turnout rate set during the last presidential election in 2012, even as the final tallies in states like california continue to be calculated, according to statistics collected by the u.s. elections project.

but among those figures were stark contrasts in key states that swing the election to trump — in ohio, wisconsin, iowa, michigan and elsewhere — indicating the president-elect’s leap from long-shot candidate to the most powerful political position in the world may have happened in part because of apathy toward hillary clinton’s candidacy, especially among the democratic base, several political scientists and organizations monitoring voter turnout told the pbs newshour.

while clinton is leading the popular vote by more than 1.5 million over trump as of sunday, she trails president obama’s 2012 totals by more than 2 million ballots — a chasm that may have cost her the election, said david becker, co-founder of the center for election and innovation and research.

“several million voters didn’t come out to vote,” becker said. “which is telling me that this idea of the trump wave, a huge number of voters shifting over to trump, is certainly not the story.”