How were the middle colonies different from the southern colonies?
a. they did not let non-puritans settle there.
b. they were settled by high-ranking nobles.
c. they produced less food for the colonies.
d. they had more social and political equality.

Middle colonies had more social and political equality. southern colonies were ruled by Patriarchy.

Explanation:

Slave labor was much prevalent in the southern colonies. The main religion practiced in middle colonies were the Anglicans, protestants and Quakers whereas in southern colonies it was Anglican religion which was followed.

In middle colonies, the economy was supported by both trade and farming and wheat was the staple food. Middle colonies had a balanced class system and the economy centered around farming communities. Southern colonies were ruled by patriarchy. Patriarchy is that father of the family is the head of the family and all others like wife, children, slaves were all under his command.

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n:

true true true true that all