subject
History, 15.01.2020 21:31 jos0305

The object of the [fourteenth almendment was
undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of the two
races before the law, but, in the nature of things, it could
not have been intended to abolish distinctions based ur
color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from politi!
equality, or a commingling of the two races upon terms
unsatisfactory to either. laws permitting, and even
requiring, their separation, in places where they are liable
to be brought into contact, do not necessarily imply the
inferiority of either race to the other, and have been
generally, if not universally, recognized as within the
competency of the state legislatures in the exercise of
their police power
-justice brown, majority opinion, plessy v. ferguson,
1896
what effect did the ruling in the case have on legislative precedent?
o
a. it mandated integration laws.
o
b. it overturned jim crow laws.
o
c. it legalized segregation laws.
o
d. it revised the fourteenth amendment.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 20:00
What is the acronym to remember when evaluating source information?
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 20:10
Was the first african american to be appointed to the u.s. supreme court.
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 21:40
Is karma the same as destiny, in the sense that everything that happens to you is predetermined? do you believe that "what goes around comes around," and if so is this the same as karma? does everyone get what they deserve, in the end?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:30
Concordtv: did the media show any bias while covering the concord city election? explain your response.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The object of the [fourteenth almendment was
undoubtedly to enforce the absolute equality of t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2021 16:40
question
Mathematics, 20.04.2021 16:40
question
English, 20.04.2021 16:40
question
Social Studies, 20.04.2021 16:40
Questions on the website: 13722367