James madison’s response to patrick henry’s arguments was to warn that

without ratification of the constitution, the union could break up

foreign powers were waiting to pounce on the individual states unless they became stronger

patrick henry preferred no government at all, a dangerous condition in which no one would be safe

the delegates were too exhausted to start over again to rewrite the articles of confederation

( only if your sure )

James Madison’s response to Patrick Henry’s arguments was to warn that __me dumb___.

without ratification of the Constitution, the Union could break up

foreign powers were waiting to pounce on the individual states unless they became stronger

Patrick Henry preferred no government at all, a dangerous condition in which no one would be safe

the delegates were too exhausted to start over again to rewrite the Articles of Confederation

(please only help if your sure thanks)

Explanation:

worcester v. georgia, legal case in which the u.s. supreme court on march 3, 1832, held (5–1) that the states did not have the right to impose regulations on native american land. andrew jackson refused to enforce the ruling, the decision form the basis for most subsequent indian law in the united states.

jcadsxjdas

explanation:

doisdforiew