Would carnegie’s workers agree with his claim that the great wealth of the gilded age few was a good thing? is the owner really to improve the economic status of the workers?

Carnegie called for treating the workers kindly. “When relations with workers go beyond the letter of the contract, it is always beneficial for the enterprise. Nothing has served the enterprise more than the good attitude of the workers," Carnegie claimed.

The only benefit brought to mankind is the accumulation of wealth by those who have the ability and energy to produce it. In addition, without wealth there can be no Philanthropist. When providing charity, the main consideration should be the desire to help those who then help themselves; give part of the necessary funds by which those who wish to grow will receive this opportunity; provide assistance to those who want to succeed so that they can achieve this. To help only occasionally and never making everything possible. Neither the individual nor the whole of humanity are better off by alms. Worthy help, with rare exceptions, does not require it. Really valuable representatives of humanity never do this, apart from emergencies or sudden changes. These were beliefs of Carnegie.

Explanation:

it affected it because the kingdoms (with trade) slowly got richer and richer.