In Schenck v. United States, what circumstance made this speech case special?

It pertained to a foreign citizen.
It involved events that occurred abroad.
It occurred during wartime.
It related to the commission of a crime.

C. It occurred during wartime.

Explanation:

Schenck v. the United States is a case in which the U.S. Preeminent Court led on March 3, 1919, that the right to speak freely security managed in the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment could be limited if the words expressed or printed represented to society an "clear and present danger."  

The case was controlled by the United States Supreme Court amid the time of World War I. The case concerned the enforcement of the Espionage Act of 1917.

Plz mark me as brainliest :)

It occured during wartime.

Explanation:

Words that create a clear and present danger to others around you, like the term shouting "Fire" in a crowded movie theater, could cause panic, someone could get hurt or die. by using your free speech to endanger others was made illegal with Schenck. However, Schenck a socialist who was trying to tell others to dodge the draft, played himself. Now the government has the judicial precedent to stop your free speech during wartime if it goes against their strategy

social contract theory basically says that all individuals are born equal, and provided a god given right to consent to be governed. american government is based of this

thomas hobbes and john locke said that we are selfish, individualistic, and constantly at war with each other, therefore we need to be controlled. 

government is defined as the legitimate use of force to control human behavior within territorial boundaries, here comes in hobbes and locke.

hobbes takes the part about controlling human behavior. while locke takes the part of legitimate use of force, since force is not legitimate unless there is consent of the people. 

there are basically 3 goals of the government: 1) maintain order by protecting life and property. 2) providing public goods, those which are typically not provided by the public sector, such as roads and education. 3) promote equality be it political, opportunist or outcome equality.