In comparison with England, by the 1700s the North American colonies:

Had a proportionately larger number of "middle rank" residents

All of these answers are correct

Also had a widespread and formal aristocracy with titles of nobility

Had no system of wage labor for poorer residents

Had a proportionately larger number of "middle rank" residents

Explanation:

The North American colonies were much more egalitarian than England (this applies to white people, enslaved africans were treated worse than medieval serfs).

This is because there was a lot of land available, and many people became landowners, instead of working someone else's farm.

Besides, the colonies did not have an established aristocracy with titles of nobilty, which means that they did not have an elite that extracted resources from the poor under the excuse of nobility.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.