subject
History, 25.02.2020 18:49 milkshakegrande101

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?
O
A. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved
O
B. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event
O
C. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it
O
D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 22.06.2019 00:50
How do you think entrepreneurs contribute or industry in america? describe your answer.
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
How did bacon's rebellion affect relations between colonists and native americans? a. relations improved after many were disgusted by the violence of the rebellion.b. after the rebellion, colonists placed less focus on the "indian problem."c. the rebellion showed many that in order to establish better relations between colonists and native americans,  slavery  had to be legalized.d. more colonists supported an armed expansion into native american territory.
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:30
Decide whether each statement is true of the indian national congress, the all muslim league, or both
Answers: 3
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:30
True or false president andrew johnson granted pardons to thousands of southerners.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a his...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722363