Scarcity is the basic economic condition that results from society's not having enough resources to produce all the things people would like to have. A society economic system determines.

A the way a society allocates it's scarce resources to produce goods and services
b they way a society organizes it's political system
c they way a society aligns technology with scientific goals
d the way a society uses religious resources to supplement economic goals and services

Society's economic system determines the way a society allocates it's scarce resources to produce goods and services.

Option: A

Explanation:

To maintain sustainable development and to ensure a good future towards our present generation optimum use of available resource is required.

That means people will use the resource as per their demand keeping one thing in their mind that we have to preserve this existing resource for our future generation also.

Society (a group of people) allocates the existing resource to produce good and services. Unless an object used in a proper way for the benefit of public it does not called resource.

To face this raising scarcity of resource people needs to be very aware and conscious.

can you give me more details?

explanation:

explanation: we can only guess at how our actions may be perceived in the future. doing something really big like killing lots of people, saving lots of people, affecting the lives of lots of people is a sure fire way of being remembered in historical records. we can also make a difference in the history records by being a small influence on something bigger, whether that is as a civil servant, scientist or artist.

of course you could argue that we all affect history just as tiny cogs in a   bigger machine.

if you mean how do people influence our opinions of things which have already happened, then simply by writing a book which looks at things form a different perspective and trying to convince people that this perspective is more accurate or truthful. people do it all the time i.e. richard the third was a terrible or was he? plenty would disagree, it's just that their views aren't the most widely known.n: