5?CFID=ff852d8c-3e76-4ee7-a619-c076 5ceb5df7&CFTOKEN=0&sessionI D=ac3d02ebf0&cratelDrac7e5& packID=aa1656e8&qgCoun
O
.
Tools
Which statement best describes the authors' points of view in the passages?
A.
In "Owning a Pet," the author emphasizes that people should not keep pets if they are unable to take good care of them, and in "Pets at Home," the author
expresses the view that pets improve people's social lives.
B.
In "Owning a Pet," the author focuses on the physical needs of pets, and in "Pets at Home," the author expresses the view that pets create a positive atmospl
their owner's household.
OC.
In "Owning a Pet," the author views pets as beneficial for the development of children, and in "Pets at Home," the author focuses on the health issues that peo
may develop by having pets.
D.
In "Owning a Pet," the author views pets as an important part of their owners' life, and in "Pets at Home," the author focuses on the problems that come with h
pets at home.
Reset
Reset
Submit
Submit

answer:

won re-nomination with no opposition he also had the support of his party

explanation:

it saw incumbent president andrew jackson, candidate of the democratic party, defeat henry clay, candidate of the national republican party. jackson won re-nomination with no opposition, and the 1832 democratic national convention replaced vice president john c. calhoun with martin van buren.

i think its 5! hope i

if you're talking about (ww2) they went bankrupt and their currency was worth nothing

explanation:

a hypothesis is an expected answer to a question, usually based on some theory or prior research. hypothesis testing is a method of determining the viability of a hypothesis. let’s use the us presidential election as an example. there are many hypotheses (questions) about how people feel or whom they will vote for. the only way to know the 100% “truth” about the answers to these questions is to ask every single possible voter – something that is impossible, expensive, time consuming etc. instead, we take samples and use statistics to make “best guesses” about the answer to a particular hypothesis. we never know for sure if our conclusion is right at the time we accept/reject it, but these techniques, when used appropriately can get us close to the truth most of the time (which is a lot better than guessing, flipping coins or throwing darts to get answers).

the tricky part about hypothesis testing is that we have to think somewhat backwards about it – we have to test what is known as the “null hypothesis”. as an example, the hypothesis might be “obama is more popular than romney” while the null hypothesis is “there is no difference in popularity between obama and romney”. we focus on the null hypothesis because it tells us exactly what the expected value of our tests should be (obama popularity = romney popularity) and we can collect data and see if it comes out that way (see next section on “significance”). if it does, then we “accept the null hypothesis” and reject our original hypothesis. if the null hypothesis is disproven, we look at the data to see if our original hypothesis holds (obama> romney).