Which of the following progressive reform movements did not advance the interests of American educational, economic, and political elites while appealing to higher ideals? please give a reason to back up your answera- immigration restrictionb- settlement housesc- prohibitiond- direct democracye- powerful and privileged Americans benefited from all of the above

Powerful and privileged Americans benefited from all of the above.

Explanation:

Although these progressive movements brought some benefits to lower class Americans, all of these also benefitted powerful and privileged Americans. Immigration restriction appealed to the desire of controlling the population of the country. Settlement houses allowed poorer people to be taken off the streets, making life for comfortable for privileged classes. Prohibition allowed the incarceration of those who traded liquor, and reduces the number of establishments where this was allowed, appealing to elite morals. Finally, direct democracy increased their access to political participation.

- "schenck v. united states, case in which the u.s. supreme court ruled on march 3, 1919, that the freedom of speech protection afforded in the u.s. constitution's first amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented to society a “clear and present danger.” "

- speech aimed to potentially create danger could be banned.

< 3

they charge for servic mark me brainliest