subject
History, 08.03.2020 23:38 genyjoannerubiera

Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a historical event?

A. To see the event through the eyes of someone who witnessed it

B. To hear about the event from someone who was directly involved

C. To learn from the conclusions of many other experts on the event

D. To understand how people felt during the period when the event
happened

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 21:00
How did the phoenicians add to the goods available in their marketplaces?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 04:30
Iron making developed in china almost a thousand years later than in the middle east. true false
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 05:30
Someone who accepted the beliefs of social darwinism would have also agreed with which of these statements?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 07:00
How did isolationism affect foreign policy?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why would a researcher use a secondary source instead of a primary source
when analyzing a his...
Questions
question
English, 04.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 18:00
question
History, 04.01.2021 18:00
question
Chemistry, 04.01.2021 18:00
question
Mathematics, 04.01.2021 18:00
Questions on the website: 13722361