In 200 words or more, write a discussion board thread that provides YOUR hypothesis as to why the ancient Mesopotamians and/or Egyptians preferred more stylized human figures over natural and anatomically-correct figures.

Hypothetically, the belief in god and goddess.

Explanation:

In the stone ages, ancient Mesopotamians and/or Egyptians preferred more stylized human figures over natural and anatomically-correct figures.

Hypothesis: Existence of god or goddess.

In ancient Mesopotamiams and Egyptians art, they modest their scriptures in line with their believe. The believe in gods and goddess in ancient Mesopotamians and/or Egyptians make them to preferred more stylized human figures.

The fertility godness molded with clay in form of pregnant women and strong believe that it is responsible for giving babies to family in need of them.

The cultural heritage, historical sites, important personalities in history were all in human form scriptures.

Although, the culture is archaic, it reflected the god and godness beliefs of the ancient Mesopotamiams and Egyptians.

The scriptures and art works were ascribed great respect. It were believed that fortune, success, and peace existed in the region because of the moldings in stylized human figures.

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.