What argument did the university make in Regents v. Bakke?
A) The student was not a good candidate to be a doctor.
B) Racial quotas were not used to make admissions decisions.
C) Minority applicants did not receive special treatment.
D) Minority students with lower grades were admitted.

it provided for selection of government employees through competitive examinations. it also made it unlawful to fire or demote covered employees for political reasons or to require them to give political service or payment, and it set up a civil service commission to enforce the law.

explanation:

i dont have that book

answer; /// i believe the correct answer is (oasis)