How were the approaches of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Malcolm X different?

A.
King focused on improving urban areas, while Malcolm X focused on civil rights in rural areas.

B.
King believed in civil disobedience, while Malcolm X believed violence was sometimes appropriate.

C.
King supported the police and their right to maintain order, while Malcolm X fought against the police.

D.
King used the religion of Islam to support his ideas, while Malcolm X was a devoted Christian leader.

Unit 12 Lesson 2: Civil Rights and the Vietnam War Test

1) Voting - Intimidation and violence towards different races was common - Dining - Black customers were not served - Bus Rides - People of different races had to sit in different areas

2. B- King believed in civil disobedience

3. C - There were protests in many neighborhoods

4. Essay

5. D-It showed Kennedy’s confidence

6. Essay

7. B- The United States launched

8. C- More women started working

9. C- Young people rejected traditional

10. Top- bottom -Weapons testing - Rachel Carson - Many animals - The first Earth Day

11. C- Nixon met D- Nixon tried

12. D- to pressure President

13. B- Johnson supported Medicare

14. B- the My Lai Massacre

15. D- The number of troops at the end

16. The last 2 sentences..it occurred and the face

17. C- Opponents of the war refused

18. C- The accident caused

19. B- The counterculture pressured

20. D- The peace symbols hint

21. D- They fought for laws protecting

22. B- It required schools

23. B- having improved housing

24. a leader who led a strike - Cesar Chavez, a religious leader who led many nonviolent protests - Martin Luther King, Jr., a freedom rider who later became chairman - John Lewis

25. B - it was strongly opposed

26. B- It meant racial segregation

27. C- Protests accompanied

28. (at the top) Stokely Carmichael founded SNCC - The 1960s - The Blank Panther - Malcolm X (at the bottom)

29. D - He believed that violence

answer; i do believe its (wife); good luck

the government closely monitored its finances to avoid another financial collapse.