The 9-11 attacks led to the Patriot Act and what many claim to be a decline in privacy and certain civil liberties in the U. S. Do you agree with a trade-off of privacy for safety? Can it go too far? What are some examples?

answer; i do believe that the (14th)fourteenth amendment is the correct answer

where are the answers

explanation:

be cause we need them

religion was the center of there society they practiced human sacrifices and which they believed kept there god strong and that he would keep bad guys away hope this

it was certainly a debatable decision, mainly because it was based primarily on political - and not on legal or social - views. since the congress at that time was led by members of the republican party, and the territory that the tribes wanted to turn into an exclusively indian state was predominantly democratic, the proposal (as expressed in the constitution) did not succeed, but the constitution itself proved to be of crucial importance in the creation of the state of oklahoma, and, most importantly, it guaranteed the involvement of representatives of the indian tribes in the government of the future joint state.  

as a member of congress, i would have voted to ratify the constitution, or at least to have it tabled. ignoring it was an interested and partial decision.