Which best describes fighting on the Eastern and Western Fronts during World War I?

A. The Western Front was a defensive stalemate from 1914-1918 while the Eastern Front was much more fluid
B. The Western Front was much longer than the Eastern Front which made trench warfare impractical
C. The technology used in the Eastern Front was more advanced than that used in the Western Front
D. The Western Front was won quickly which allowed for a longer, protracted conflict on the Eastern Front

honestly you should get that checked out because it really isn't normal

the conditions that made the byzantine empire vulnerable to attacks by the muslin turks were the sack of constantinople by western crusaders, the conquests of the sultanate of rum, presence of rival kingdoms and finally the set up of fiefdoms at the empire which were owned by the ghazis (turkish warriors).

the correct answer is: the fact that the anti-federalist papers were considered poorly written.

no options provided, here,but the answer to this question is often: a historian cites a japanese newspaper article published a year after the end of world war ii in order to draw conclusions about the effect of the war on the japanese economy.

clearly from the answer, the historian alludes to historical sources,and records to aid in analyzing and drawing conclusion on the effect of the war on the economy of japan.