The colonists were upset with Parliament. Which of these was NOT a reason why they were mad?

A.
The Sugar Act and Stamp Act

B.
The colonists had no vote in Parliament

C.
The Boston Massacre

D.
Parliament was jailing colonists without reasonThe colonists were upset with Parliament. Which of these was NOT a reason why they were mad?

A.
The Sugar Act and Stamp Act

B.
The colonists had no vote in Parliament

C.
The Boston Massacre

D.
Parliament was jailing colonists without reason

D.

Explanation:

Colonists were mad that Britain unfairly taxed them without any say to whether it was fair to the colony or not, so yes they were mad for not having representation and for unfair taxes (sugar act & stamp act). The Boston Massacre was a HUGE reason for the colonists being upset with Britain because the solidiers fired on an unarmmed crowd.

D

Explanation:

From my knowledge, Parliament wasn't jailing colonists without reason

the berlin blockade was an international crisis that arose from an attempt by the soviet union, in 1948–49, to force the western allied powers (the united states, the united kingdom, and france) to abandon their post-world war ii jurisdictions in west berlin. in march 1948 the allied powers decided to unite their different occupation zones of germany into a single economic unit. in protest, the soviet representative withdrew from the allied control council. coincident with the introduction of a new deutsche mark in west berlin (as throughout west germany), which the soviets regarded as a violation of agreements with the allies, the soviet occupation forces in eastern germany began a blockade of all rail, road, and water communications between berlin and the west. on june 24 the soviets announced that the four-power administration of berlin had ceased and that the allies no longer had any rights there.

yes

explanation:

the fighting words doctrine, in united states constitutional law, is a limitation to freedom of speech as protected by the first amendment to the united states constitution. in 1942, the u.s. supreme court established the doctrine by a 9–0 decision in chaplinsky v. new hampshire.