History, 03.05.2020 13:41 jjaheimhicks3419

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST + WORTH 10 POINTS
Which philosophe would most likely have supported the U. S. Bill of Rights?
- Montesquieu
- Voltaire
- John Locke
- Rousseau
WILL ALSO GIVE THANKS + 5 STAR RATING

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: hi105

Locke argued that natural rights such as life, liberty, and property existed in the state of nature and could never be taken away or even voluntarily given up by individuals. These rights were “inalienable” (impossible to surrender). Locke also disagreed with Hobbes about the social contract. For him, it was not just an agreement among the people, but between them and the sovereign (preferably a king).

According to Locke, the natural rights of individuals limited the power of the king. The king did not hold absolute power, as Hobbes had said, but acted only to enforce and protect the natural rights of the people. If a sovereign violated these rights, the social contract was broken, and the people had the right to revolt and establish a new government. Less than 100 years after Locke wrote his Two Treatises of Government, Thomas Jefferson used his theory in writing the Declaration of Independence.

Although Locke spoke out for freedom of thought, speech, and religion, he believed property to be the most important natural right. He declared that owners may do whatever they want with their property as long as they do not invade the rights of others.

Answer from: Quest

i do believe its (d) it allowed the government to offer pioneers sixty acres of western land if they lived on it and made improvements to it.

explanation: signed into law in may 1862, the homestead act opened up settlement in the western united states, allowing any american, including freed slaves, to put in a claim for up to 160 free acres of federal land. by the end of the civil war, 15,000 homestead claims had been established, and more followed in the postwar years

Answer from: Quest

imperialism and colonization in 1936

part of the politics series

basic forms of government

power structure

separation

associated state dominion chiefdom

federalism

federation confederation devolution

integration

empire hegemony unitary state

administrative division

power source

democracy

power of many

direct representative liberal social demarchy others

oligarchy

power of few

anocracy aristocracy plutocracy kakistocracy kraterocracy stratocracy timocracy meritocracy technocracy geniocracy noocracy kritarchy particracy ergatocracy netocracy

autocracy

power of one

despotism dictatorship military dictatorship

others

anarchy theocracy

power ideology

monarchy vs. republic

socio-political ideologies

absolute legalist

constitutional

parliamentary directorial semi-presidential presidential

authoritarian vs. libertarian

socio-economic ideologies

tribalism despotism feudalism colonialism distributism anarchism socialism communism totalitarianism

global vs. local

geo-cultural ideologies

commune city-state national government intergovernmental organisation world government

politics portal

vte

an empire is a sovereign state functioning as an aggregate of nations or people that are ruled over by an emperor or another kind of monarch. the territory and population of an empire is commonly of greater extent than the one of a kingdom.[1]

an empire can be made solely of contiguous territories, such as the austro-hungarian empire or the russian empire, or of territories far remote from the homeland, such as a colonial empire. aside from the more formal usage, the word empire can also refer colloquially to a large-scale business enterprise (e.g. a transnational corporation), a political organisation controlled by a single individual (a political boss), or a group (political bosses).[2] the word empire is associated with such other words as imperialism, colonialism, and globalization. empire is often used to describe a displeasure to overpowering situations.[3]

Another question on History

History, 21.06.2019 18:30

What was a major component of reaganomics? 1. the belief that tax cuts to the wealthy would trickle down to the less fortunate. 2.the belief that providing tax cuts to lower-socioeconomic americans would boost the economy. 3.the belief that boosting home ownership would lead to americans having an investment in the economy. 4.the belief that correcting the business cycle would boost output and reduce unemployment.

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 02:30

Text: dante's inferno canto iv analyze the setting that dante develops in canto iv. examine how 1) the choices he makes to describe the setting and 2) the characters he places in this setting affect the reader's understanding of the first circle of hell, limbo. be sure to use specific details from the text to support your ideas

Answers: 2

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 04:00

In a low-income household in the developed world, more than 30% of a woman's income typically goes toward a. transportation costs b. child care c. clothing and incidentals d. the repayment of educational loans

Answers: 1

Answer

History, 22.06.2019 06:30

What primary benefit did theodore roosevelt’s see in digging a canal through panama?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST + WORTH 10 POINTS
Which philosophe would most likely have supported the U...

Questions