Can targeting civilians and/or their property be justified in war? Why or why not? Include example from the civil war.

i also think he is correct. i believe they came to washington to protest their rights.

the answer is option b.

explanation:

they could veto laws. this announcement does not portray the individuals from the roman senate since the praetor urban was the one that could veto laws. the power or right vested in one part of an administration to drop or put off the choices, institutions, and so on., of another branch, particularly the privilege of a president, representative, or other ceo to dismiss bills gone by the lawmaking body.

either d or b, i'm not to sure. but my gut tells me it's prob going to be b

a. true almost all of them do !