subject
History, 27.09.2019 21:30 ShlomoShekelstein

Ahistorian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in europe during the middle ages. she reads a speech by a bishop in the middle ages claiming that kings were appointed by god to rule over people. she then explains why the bishop would have believed this idea, even if it is not one that most people believe today. what is she doing in this paper?
the historian is explaining cause and effect.
the historian is placing the argument in historical context.
the historian is comparing and contrasting primary sources.
the historian is developing a hypothesis.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 18:00
Me < 3 there are multiple ‘3rd party’ political parties in the us. what are the benefits of having 3rd parties? what are the disadvantages of being a member of one? would the u.s. benefit if there were more 3rd parties created, more support for the current ones, or would it be best to get rid of them altogether? why?
Answers: 2
question
History, 21.06.2019 23:00
How did france’s tax policies contribute to the french revolution?
Answers: 2
question
History, 22.06.2019 08:20
Which application of a new technology can be attributed to an invention of thomas edison?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 09:40
What will cause your license to be revoked
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Ahistorian is writing a paper on the idea of the divine right of kings in europe during the middle a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.10.2019 09:30
question
Physics, 03.10.2019 09:30
question
Mathematics, 03.10.2019 09:30
Questions on the website: 13722360