How did the Supreme Court rulings regarding segregation differ in the time

between Plessy v. Ferguson and Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg?

A. Both cases were left undecided by the Supreme Court.

B. Both cases were against the separate-but-equal doctrine.

C. Support for the separate-but-equal doctrine increased.

D. Support for the separate-but-equal doctrine diminished.

HELP ME PLS!

C

I've never heard of Swann case but from process of elimantion I know plessy v Ferguson helped the increase in sparate bu equal so that makes since.

the catholic church withhold people's access to the bible during the middle ages.

people could go to church and listen to the teachings, but it was absolutely forbidden to own and/or read the books of both the old and new testaments. it was also prohibited to translate the books (which where originally in biblical hebrew) to any other language.

this was done so the church could remain in control of what their teachings were and to enhance their importance and power, while also being able to judge people's actions through information that was unavailable for the general public.