subject
History, 27.05.2020 01:59 nsaleh567

In 2013, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that police can take DNA samples
from anybody under arrest for any crime, regardless of whether DNA is
relevant to their arrest. (This was in a case regarding an American citizen.)
Does this change your answer to the previous question? Why or why not?
(Article)


In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police can take DNA samples from anybody under arrest fo

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on History

question
History, 21.06.2019 15:50
What determines the properties of a mineral
Answers: 1
question
History, 21.06.2019 22:30
Nhis essay about the atomic bombing of japan during world war ii, a student has used statistics he found in an article in the online archives of the irish times. the article is from may 5, 1997, and is called “cancer finding in hiroshima.” there is no author given. how should the student cite this source using mla citation format?
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 03:30
34. in 2009, impaired drivers killed 154 a. child passengers of vehicles b. other motorists c. pedestrians d. none of the above
Answers: 1
question
History, 22.06.2019 06:50
The development of england as a nation-state occurred because of increasing?
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
In 2013, the U. S. Supreme Court ruled that police can take DNA samples
from anybody under arr...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:30
question
Mathematics, 30.04.2021 01:30
Questions on the website: 13722363