Which statement reflects an outcome of the North American Free Trade Agreement?
Corporations limit the outsourcing of labor.
Imports and exports are taxed at a higher price.
Goods flow across the borders with fewer taxes.
Resources are exchanged at a drastically lower rate.

Goods flow across the borders with fewer taxes.

Explanation:

The North American Free Trade Agreement which came into effect in January 1994, was an agreement between the countries in North America, which includes United States of America, Canada and Mexico. The purpose of the agreement is to encourage international trade among members by reducing various tariffs which normally accompanied international trade, specifically those relating to Agriculture, automobiles and textile products.

Hence, the statement that reflects an outcome of the North American Free Trade Agreement is Goods flow across the borders with fewer taxes.

1- in bradbury's  fahrenheit 451, all books are banned and burned upon discovery. in the nazi germany, books considered to be subversive to the regime would be burned to keep the population from generating ideologies that could challenge nazism.

2- was bradbury correct in his literal interpretation of  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.”? in some way, yes. when knowledge is not only limited, but also controlled, the people tied to it are led to their demise. just like in the novel, people in nazi germany who owned  subversive books were punished not only by the burning of their property, but also by the discrimination that followed after such a public form of consequence. if a person was seen being confiscated  subversive  books, they may be considered as an ally to the jews, which meant pretty much the same as being the enemy back then. because of the extreme exclusion and suffering that followed this punishment, it's almost like dying a slow death.

in this way, the phrase  “where they burn books, they will also ultimately burn people.” is both literal and figurative.

explanation:

mark brainliest and have a great day!

what precedent do you see the ordinance of 1787 setting for the 1st amendment of the us constitution : )

this person under me, copied me. owo